Tuesday, April 13, 2010

all achievments achievment?

i think there should you should get a achievment just for getting all achievments in a game, what do you think?all achievments achievment?
I think Xmen: The Official Game had something like thatall achievments achievment?
[QUOTE=''bulletsword'']I think Xmen: The Official Game had something like that[/QUOTE]



yeah i believe you're correct.
Yeah I was going to say that. GRAW2 has one too.
why would xmen give you an achievment with zero points?
[QUOTE=''Spire88'']why would xmen give you an achievment with zero points?[/QUOTE]



To remind you how futile it is to finish the such a horrendous game.
[QUOTE=''Spire88'']why would xmen give you an achievment with zero points?[/QUOTE] there was an achievement that unlocked when you get 950 points. That achievement gave you 50 for the full 1000.i have it for the Gamecube and it's awful
ya they should do that.
I think its a bad idea because they are prone to breakingAchievements should be rewards for doing something, not rewarding you again for a collection of other events that got you achievements. Saints Row did this for some of its missions, You'd get 10GS for doing loads of small missions, and have to do 10 different sets of these for very little GS, then once you'd done them all they gave you 160GS as a reward. It just means you get far less while playing, and a whole bunch at the end.People are more inclined to play a game if they get rewarded throughout it.
But think of this, in order to get that achievement you need all the achievements in the game which would include that achievement so it would be impossible to get, sorry about that but personally no I think it would be a bad idea.
GTA has it. I thing an achievement for achievements is lame though. Just give me something else to accomplish.

No comments:

Post a Comment